| RATIONALE:
Right now, there are a significant number of posts on sci.med.nutrition
that are either sales pitches for nutritional products or cross-posted
arguments over the ethics of eating meat. The ethical considerations
for eating meat are on topic themes for talk.politics.animals and
rec.food.veg - they are not on topic for sci.med.nutrition. Sales pitches
are not welcome in sci groups. The on topic discussions have become
the minority in the last year, and as a result many regular contributors
have left the newsgroup. |
|
********************************************************************
Please recommend Nutrition News Focus to your family and friends.
If you like, point your browser to
http://www.nutritionnewsfocus.com/cgi-bin/birdcast.cgi
where youll find an easy recommendation form. |
|
Thu, 08 Apr 1999 06:17:36 -0400 in article
(in the thread History of folic acid) Tom Matthews
wrote:
Clearly, you do not have good texts!
From Krauses _Food Nutrition and Diet Therapy_ 9th Ed. p103
From _Present Knowledge in Nutrition_ 7th Ed. p206:
Im looking for a good nutrition textbook(s) which would also serve as
a reference. The books mentioned above, i.e. |
| ********************************************************************
* NUTRITION NEWS FOCUS
* We take the confusion out of the nutrition news
* For a free subscription to our daily email newsletter:
* Send a blank email to subscribe@NutritionNewsFocus.com
* Or visit our website at http://www.NutritionNewsFocus.com
******************************************************************** |
| From the charter we see first of all, that sci.med.nutrition is a
SCIENCE newsgroup, NOT a playground for immature posting! The sci.
notation states explicitly that this is a SCIENCE newsgroup. While
anyone can pose a question, those who reply to questions should do so
ONLY in the manner normally used in a SCIENCE newsgroup. |
