|
Thu, 08 Apr 1999 06:17:36 -0400 in article
(in the thread History of folic acid) Tom Matthews
wrote:
Clearly, you do not have good texts!
From Krauses _Food Nutrition and Diet Therapy_ 9th Ed. p103
From _Present Knowledge in Nutrition_ 7th Ed. p206:
Im looking for a good nutrition textbook(s) which would also serve as
a reference. The books mentioned above, i.e. |
| DISCLAIMER: The information in Nutrition News Focus is intended
only to help you understand the Nutrition News. We do not recommend
any treatment, food or supplement. It is not intended to replace
the advice of a physician. If you read something in this newsletter
that in any way contradicts what your physician tells you, TAKE YOUR
PHYSICIANS ADVICE, NOT OURS. |
| RATIONALE:
Right now, there are a significant number of posts on sci.med.nutrition
that are either sales pitches for nutritional products or cross-posted
arguments over the ethics of eating meat. The ethical considerations
for eating meat are on topic themes for talk.politics.animals and
rec.food.veg - they are not on topic for sci.med.nutrition. Sales pitches
are not welcome in sci groups. The on topic discussions have become
the minority in the last year, and as a result many regular contributors
have left the newsgroup. |
| Im writing to invite everyone at alt.support.arthritis to take a free
subscription to Nutrition News Focus. I hope I am not offending
anyone by posting to an alternative health discussion group, and will
explain my rationale for posting here at the bottom of my note. In
any case I think youll find our information quite relevant to the
effort to cope with disease. |
| Everyone who participates in sci.med.nutrition is on a diet in order to
improve their health, and promote their personal longevity, NOT to lose
weight. Furthermore, many participants believe in taking nutritional
supplements just as much as they believe in eating a healthy diet. |
